Угадайте автора.

[Shkludov]

P.Shkludov wrote :
В итоге в FMJD посчитали за благо больше не связываться со столь одиозными, самовлюбленными и хамоватыми ортодоксами, которыми переполнена НИЩАЯ шашечная композиция...

Ultimately, the FMJD decided it would be best to no longer associate with such odious, narcissistic, and boorish orthodoxies,, who applied towards email address of Grushevsky fabricated by P. Shkludov and V. Matus, which was awarded the title of International Arbiter of Draughts Composition. As E. Zubov correctly noted, N. Hrushevskyi never judged anything as a person l; the email address attributed to Hrushevskyi, used to assign scores to the right people, judged for him. Like this a poor draughts team, led by beggars from the former USSR, was enriched with yet another false title, awarded not to a living person, but to some spirit in the form of an email address. In vain did former FMJD vice president Peter Hildering complain about P. Shkludov's unfair refereeing: it wasn't Shkludov, but Anton Pavlovich Mekhov - a client of a psychiatric hospital from ward No. 6 of the famouse Russian writer Anton Pavlovich Chekhov.

Перевод на русский язык:

В конечном итоге ФМЖД решила, что лучше больше не общаться с такими одиозными, самовлюблёнными и хамоватыми ортодоксами, которые ссылались на адрес электронной почты Грушевского, сфабрикованный П. Шклудовым и В. Матусом, которому было присвоено звание Международного арбитра по шашечной композиции. Как справедливо заметил Е. Зубов, Н. Грушевский никогда ничего не судил как личность; адрес электронной почты, приписываемый Грушевскому, использовался для выставления оценок нужным людям и судил за него. Вот так бедная шашечная команда, возглавляемая нищими из бывшего СССР, обогатилась очередным фальшивым званием, присвоенным не живому человеку, а некоему духу в виде адреса электронной почты. Напрасно бывший вице-президент ФМЖД Петер Хильдеринг сетовал на несправедливое судейство П. Шклудова: это был не Шклудов, а Антон Павлович Мехов — клиент психиатрической больницы из палаты № 6 знаменитого русского писателя Антона Павловича Чехова.

К величайшему сожалению одиозная личность - А.Фомин - до сих пор гадит шашечной композиции...
Его опусы, наполненные клеветой и ненавистью до сих пор находят место здесь - на WDF - и на "МиФ", где к клеветнику относятся терпимо.
Анализировать текст Фомина (вверху) не имеет никакого смысла, так как всё по Лепшичу: "Фомин врёт едва открывая рот..."
Его тексты не имеют ничего общего с истиной. И даже с правдой не имеют ничего общего.
Его тексты - это фантастический вымысел базирующийся на знакомых фамилиях.

И я разгадал неожиданное появление Фомина на польской ветке форума!
На сегодня (если я не ошибаюсь) Президентом FMJD является Яцек Павлицкий.
Мы давно не общались с Яцеком, но отношения можно было назвать дружескими.
Сегодня Яцек вынужден (в силу своего положения) озвучивать то, что от него требуют сверху...
А Фомин просто пытается влиять на мнение Яцека даже таким неуместным способом, как публикация клеветы на польской ветке форума WDF.

[FOMIN]

Re: Inter...

by LeoMinor Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:16 pm

P. Shkludov wrote:

The new myth about the bad Shkludov is nothing new.

And what kind of "new myth about the bad Shkludov" can you write?!

Hasn't everything already been written, and hasn't other authors, even unknown to me, written the characterization (for example, the characterization of "psychic vampire," "the hero of a F.Dostoevsky novel," and I especially liked the characterizations of S. Yushkevich in his new book). Our hero would also be surprised by the characterizations from his "friends," the chameleons/diplomats/poltrons; and finally, what does Lepshich have to do with it?!

He didn't force anyone, and couldn't force anyone. A hero needs to think seriously about himself, behind his own four walls. For several months, I didn't bother the gentleman from Novopolotsk and didn't participate in any conversation, but the devil wouldn't let him rest, and he started writing nonsense about" Myth " and Lepshich, and now he's surprised. He keeps writing that I'm lying, and then he repeats and confirms everything I wrote about him. Strange!

Unlike him, I'm a person who hates lies, who hates dishonest people, who sympathizes with chameleons and poltrons. I've never called myself a grandmaster and/or world champion, and I don't intend to, because I dislike lottery just as much as I dislike dishonest people. My victory was accidental, and I can't be proud of it. By the way, if the judges had been Katyukha, Mackevičius, Shayakhmetov, Lyakhovsky (and the like), then anyone could have won, even such a pleasant person for me as B. Ivanov (I don't want to offend anyone listed).

I can only say that I was lucky that one of the judges was Mr. Valdas Bieliauskas, and no, there was some Frenchman there who even his compatriots don't know...
It's also strange that I'm connected with Mr. A. Lukyanov and/or A. Fomin (by the way, the latter writes to me in an incomprehensible language and about incomprehensible details, with a lot of repetition and too many inappropriate expressions, and can't express his thoughts so that everyone understands them immediately – by the way, I don't speak Russian properly). At the same time, it's vile to accuse me of Mr. A. Lukyanov. What am I guilty of here?! Anyone except Tsydik can freely register on Myth and write whatever they want. I helped someone (as I did with A. Fomin) until I learned to write posts myself. And my opinion differs from that of A. Fomin and A. Lukyanov no less (much more, of course) than my opinion of even my friends, such as M. Tsvetov and V. Bieliauskas. Let's not forget that Mr. A. Lukyanov, not long ago from Planeta, together with Mr. P. Shkludov, aimed poisoned arrows at me. Of course, I forgive, but I never forget. I still haven't found any like-minded people or supporters (and I'm almost 62 years old), and I don't have many friends either. Why would I want to include strangers like Mr. A. Fomin or A. Lukyanov (I don't even care what they write?)? I'm ready to help anyone who asks, and I'd even help P. Shkludov himself. His main mistake was deciding to use me to treat his own complexes. He had a poor choice. The "psychic vampire" hasn't yet realized that my blood is poisoned and that he needs to look for other victims.

A.Fomin : Dedicated to Mr. M. Lepshich
https://fmjd.org/dias2/save/17567025012.png

image_handler - 2025-10-10T182148.577.png (5.3 KiB) Viewed 397 times

[Shkludov]

Re: Inter...

by LeoMinor Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:16 pm

P. Shkludov wrote:

The new myth about the bad Shkludov is nothing new.

And what kind of "new myth about the bad Shkludov" can you write?!

Hasn't everything already been written, and hasn't other authors, even unknown to me, written the characterization (for example, the characterization of "psychic vampire," "the hero of a F.Dostoevsky novel," and I especially liked the characterizations of S. Yushkevich in his new book). Our hero would also be surprised by the characterizations from his "friends," the chameleons/diplomats/poltrons; and finally, what does Lepshich have to do with it?!

He didn't force anyone, and couldn't force anyone. A hero needs to think seriously about himself, behind his own four walls. For several months, I didn't bother the gentleman from Novopolotsk and didn't participate in any conversation, but the devil wouldn't let him rest, and he started writing nonsense about" Myth " and Lepshich, and now he's surprised. He keeps writing that I'm lying, and then he repeats and confirms everything I wrote about him. Strange!

Unlike him, I'm a person who hates lies, who hates dishonest people, who sympathizes with chameleons and poltrons. I've never called myself a grandmaster and/or world champion, and I don't intend to, because I dislike lottery just as much as I dislike dishonest people. My victory was accidental, and I can't be proud of it. By the way, if the judges had been Katyukha, Mackevičius, Shayakhmetov, Lyakhovsky (and the like), then anyone could have won, even such a pleasant person for me as B. Ivanov (I don't want to offend anyone listed).

I can only say that I was lucky that one of the judges was Mr. Valdas Bieliauskas, and no, there was some Frenchman there who even his compatriots don't know...
It's also strange that I'm connected with Mr. A. Lukyanov and/or A. Fomin (by the way, the latter writes to me in an incomprehensible language and about incomprehensible details, with a lot of repetition and too many inappropriate expressions, and can't express his thoughts so that everyone understands them immediately – by the way, I don't speak Russian properly). At the same time, it's vile to accuse me of Mr. A. Lukyanov. What am I guilty of here?! Anyone except Tsydik can freely register on Myth and write whatever they want. I helped someone (as I did with A. Fomin) until I learned to write posts myself. And my opinion differs from that of A. Fomin and A. Lukyanov no less (much more, of course) than my opinion of even my friends, such as M. Tsvetov and V. Bieliauskas. Let's not forget that Mr. A. Lukyanov, not long ago from Planeta, together with Mr. P. Shkludov, aimed poisoned arrows at me. Of course, I forgive, but I never forget. I still haven't found any like-minded people or supporters (and I'm almost 62 years old), and I don't have many friends either. Why would I want to include strangers like Mr. A. Fomin or A. Lukyanov (I don't even care what they write?)? I'm ready to help anyone who asks, and I'd even help P. Shkludov himself. His main mistake was deciding to use me to treat his own complexes. He had a poor choice. The "psychic vampire" hasn't yet realized that my blood is poisoned and that he needs to look for other victims.

A.Fomin : Dedicated to Mr. M. Lepshich

Оригинальная неприязнь от Лепшича:

П.Шклудов писал :

новый миф о плохом Шклудове - это давно не новость

А какой "новый миф о плохом Шклудове" можно написать ?!

Разве и до сих пор все не написанно и разве характеристику не написали другие , мне даже неизвестные авторы ( например характеристика "психический вампир" , "герой романа Достоевского" , а особенно понравились характеристики С.Юшкевича в его новой книге ). Наш герой удивился бы и характеристикам от его "друзьей" хамелеонов/дипломатов/полтронов ; и как заключение - при чем тут Лепшич?!

Он никого не заставлял и не мог заставлять. Герою надо самом в четире стены подумать серёзно о себе. Несколько месяцев я не трогал господина из Новополоцка и вообще не участвовал в любом разговоре , но черт ему не давал спокоя и он начал писать ерунду о МиФ-е и Лепшичу и теперь он удивляется. Он и дальше пишет что я вру , а потом сам повторяет и потверждает все что я о ему написал. Старнно !

За разницу от его я человек который ложь ненавидит , который ненавидит непорядочных людей , который соболезновает на хамелеонов и полтронов. Себя не називал никогда гроссмейстером и/или чемпионом мира и не собираюсь , так как я лотрею не люблю так же как и непорядочных/нечестных людей. Моя победа случайная и я её не могу гордится. Кстати , если бы судьи были Катюха, Mackevičius , Шаяхметов, Ляховский ( и тому подобно ) , то победителем мог быть любой , даже и мне симпатичный Б.Иванов ( всерёз , никого не хочется обидеть из перечисленных ).

Я лишь могу сказать что мне повезло , что я везунчик что один из судей был господин Valdas Bieliauskas , а нет там какой то Француз которого даже не знают его соотечественники ...

Странное и связивание меня с господином А.Лукьяновым и/или А.Фоминым ( кстати , второй пишет мне непонятным языком и о непонятных деталях , с много повторении и слишком много несоответственных выражении , не умеет выразить свою мысль чтобы всем и сразу было понятно - кстати у меня русский не материный ). В то же время подлость меня обвинаять относительно господина А.Лукьянова. В чем я здесь виновать ?! Каждый , кроме Цыдика , может свободно регистрироватся на МиФ-е и писать все что угодно. Я помог человеку ( так как и А.Фомину ) пока не научился самостоятельно писать постов. А мое мнение с мнением А.Фомина и А.Лукьянова отличается не менее ( гораздо больше , конечно ) чем мое мнение в отношении даже моих друзьей как например М.Цветов , V.Bieliauskas . Не надо забыть что господин А.Лукьянов ещё недавно с Планеты совместно с господином П.Шклудовым направлял отравленные стрелки на меня. Конечно , я прощаю но никогда не забываю. Я до сих пор ( а мне почти 62 года ) не нашел одномышленников и тех кто меня бы поддерживал , друзьей тоже у меня мало , тем более зачем мне причисливать незнакомых людей как господин А.Фомин или А.Лукьянов ( меня даже не интересует это что пишут ). А помочь я готов любом кто меня попросит , даже помог бы и самом П.Шклудову. Его основная ошибка что собственные комплексы он решил лечить на мне. Выбор у его был плохой. "Психический вампир" ещё не понял что у меня кровь отравленная и что надо искать других жертв

Настанет момент - и я всё это проанализирую.
Сейчас некогда смотреть эту муть.

Дипломированный баран. Кандрат Крапива, с белор
Надежда Стариш
Басня

В одном селе, в одной из стран
Ходил с отарою баран.

Баранов умных вообще немного,
А этот же дурней дурного –

Не узнаёт своих ворот:
Понятно – голова слаба.
А лоб так вот наоборот –
Такого в жизни я не видел лба:

Когда нет умника другого рядом,
Побиться чтоб на лбах,
Так он разгонится – да в стенку – бах!!!
Иной бы был уже на небесах,
А с ним – порядок!

И вот за глупость эту
Его "учёным" в шутку окрестил народ.
А чтоб не пробегал своих ворот –
Ему повесили примету.

Вот – говорят – диплом тебе.
Что это за "диплом" – баран ни "ме", ни "бе",
Но перед Кошкою он тут же стал хвалиться:
- А что ж ты думала, сестрица?
Есть чем похвастаться, как ты тут ни ворчи:
Диплом я заслужил, однако ж, головою!
И не равняйся ты со мною!

- Об этом лучше помолчи! –
Сказала ему Кошка –
Вот был бы ты умней немножко,
Раскинуть мог умом своим овечьим,
Увидел бы, что здесь гордиться нечем,

Ведь заслужил ты свой диплом
Не головой, а лбом.
----
Иной баран ни "ме", ни "бе",
А хочет звание себе.

[FOMIN]

Re: Inter...

by LeoMinor Mon Dec 23, 2013 6:16 pm

P. Shkludov wrote:

The new myth about the bad Shkludov is nothing new.

And what kind of "new myth about the bad Shkludov" can you write?!

Hasn't everything already been written, and hasn't other authors, even unknown to me, written the characterization (for example, the characterization of "psychic vampire," "the hero of a F.Dostoevsky novel," and I especially liked the characterizations of S. Yushkevich in his new book). Our hero would also be surprised by the characterizations from his "friends," the chameleons/diplomats/poltrons; and finally, what does Lepshich have to do with it?!

He didn't force anyone, and couldn't force anyone. A hero needs to think seriously about himself, behind his own four walls. For several months, I didn't bother the gentleman from Novopolotsk and didn't participate in any conversation, but the devil wouldn't let him rest, and he started writing nonsense about" Myth " and Lepshich, and now he's surprised. He keeps writing that I'm lying, and then he repeats and confirms everything I wrote about him. Strange!

Unlike him, I'm a person who hates lies, who hates dishonest people, who sympathizes with chameleons and poltrons. I've never called myself a grandmaster and/or world champion, and I don't intend to, because I dislike lottery just as much as I dislike dishonest people. My victory was accidental, and I can't be proud of it. By the way, if the judges had been Katyukha, Mackevičius, Shayakhmetov, Lyakhovsky (and the like), then anyone could have won, even such a pleasant person for me as B. Ivanov (I don't want to offend anyone listed).

I can only say that I was lucky that one of the judges was Mr. Valdas Bieliauskas, and no, there was some Frenchman there who even his compatriots don't know...
It's also strange that I'm connected with Mr. A. Lukyanov and/or A. Fomin (by the way, the latter writes to me in an incomprehensible language and about incomprehensible details, with a lot of repetition and too many inappropriate expressions, and can't express his thoughts so that everyone understands them immediately – by the way, I don't speak Russian properly). At the same time, it's vile to accuse me of Mr. A. Lukyanov. What am I guilty of here?! Anyone except Tsydik can freely register on Myth and write whatever they want. I helped someone (as I did with A. Fomin) until I learned to write posts myself. And my opinion differs from that of A. Fomin and A. Lukyanov no less (much more, of course) than my opinion of even my friends, such as M. Tsvetov and V. Bieliauskas. Let's not forget that Mr. A. Lukyanov, not long ago from Planeta, together with Mr. P. Shkludov, aimed poisoned arrows at me. Of course, I forgive, but I never forget. I still haven't found any like-minded people or supporters (and I'm almost 62 years old), and I don't have many friends either. Why would I want to include strangers like Mr. A. Fomin or A. Lukyanov (I don't even care what they write?)? I'm ready to help anyone who asks, and I'd even help P. Shkludov himself. His main mistake was deciding to use me to treat his own complexes. He had a poor choice. The "psychic vampire" hasn't yet realized that my blood is poisoned and that he needs to look for other victims.

Оригинальная неприязнь от Лепшича:

П.Шклудов писал :

новый миф о плохом Шклудове - это давно не новость

А какой "новый миф о плохом Шклудове" можно написать ?!

Разве и до сих пор все не написанно и разве характеристику не написали другие , мне даже неизвестные авторы ( например характеристика "психический вампир" , "герой романа Достоевского" , а особенно понравились характеристики С.Юшкевича в его новой книге ). Наш герой удивился бы и характеристикам от его "друзьей" хамелеонов/дипломатов/полтронов ; и как заключение - при чем тут Лепшич?!

Он никого не заставлял и не мог заставлять. Герою надо самом в четире стены подумать серёзно о себе. Несколько месяцев я не трогал господина из Новополоцка и вообще не участвовал в любом разговоре , но черт ему не давал спокоя и он начал писать ерунду о МиФ-е и Лепшичу и теперь он удивляется. Он и дальше пишет что я вру , а потом сам повторяет и потверждает все что я о ему написал. Старнно !

За разницу от его я человек который ложь ненавидит , который ненавидит непорядочных людей , который соболезновает на хамелеонов и полтронов. Себя не називал никогда гроссмейстером и/или чемпионом мира и не собираюсь , так как я лотрею не люблю так же как и непорядочных/нечестных людей. Моя победа случайная и я её не могу гордится. Кстати , если бы судьи были Катюха, Mackevičius , Шаяхметов, Ляховский ( и тому подобно ) , то победителем мог быть любой , даже и мне симпатичный Б.Иванов ( всерёз , никого не хочется обидеть из перечисленных ).

Я лишь могу сказать что мне повезло , что я везунчик что один из судей был господин Valdas Bieliauskas , а нет там какой то Француз которого даже не знают его соотечественники ...

Странное и связивание меня с господином А.Лукьяновым и/или А.Фоминым ( кстати , второй пишет мне непонятным языком и о непонятных деталях , с много повторении и слишком много несоответственных выражении , не умеет выразить свою мысль чтобы всем и сразу было понятно - кстати у меня русский не материный ). В то же время подлость меня обвинаять относительно господина А.Лукьянова. В чем я здесь виновать ?! Каждый , кроме Цыдика , может свободно регистрироватся на МиФ-е и писать все что угодно. Я помог человеку ( так как и А.Фомину ) пока не научился самостоятельно писать постов. А мое мнение с мнением А.Фомина и А.Лукьянова отличается не менее ( гораздо больше , конечно ) чем мое мнение в отношении даже моих друзьей как например М.Цветов , V.Bieliauskas . Не надо забыть что господин А.Лукьянов ещё недавно с Планеты совместно с господином П.Шклудовым направлял отравленные стрелки на меня. Конечно , я прощаю но никогда не забываю. Я до сих пор ( а мне почти 62 года ) не нашел одномышленников и тех кто меня бы поддерживал , друзьей тоже у меня мало , тем более зачем мне причисливать незнакомых людей как господин А.Фомин или А.Лукьянов ( меня даже не интересует это что пишут ). А помочь я готов любом кто меня попросит , даже помог бы и самом П.Шклудову. Его основная ошибка что собственные комплексы он решил лечить на мне. Выбор у его был плохой. "Психический вампир" ещё не понял что у меня кровь отравленная и что надо искать других жертв

Настанет момент - и я всё это проанализирую.
Сейчас некогда смотреть эту муть.

Дипломированный баран. Кандрат Крапива, с белор
Надежда Стариш
Басня

В одном селе, в одной из стран
Ходил с отарою баран.

Баранов умных вообще немного,
А этот же дурней дурного –

Не узнаёт своих ворот:
Понятно – голова слаба.
А лоб так вот наоборот –
Такого в жизни я не видел лба:

Когда нет умника другого рядом,
Побиться чтоб на лбах,
Так он разгонится – да в стенку – бах!!!
Иной бы был уже на небесах,
А с ним – порядок!

И вот за глупость эту
Его "учёным" в шутку окрестил народ.
А чтоб не пробегал своих ворот –
Ему повесили примету.

Вот – говорят – диплом тебе.
Что это за "диплом" – баран ни "ме", ни "бе",
Но перед Кошкою он тут же стал хвалиться:
- А что ж ты думала, сестрица?
Есть чем похвастаться, как ты тут ни ворчи:
Диплом я заслужил, однако ж, головою!
И не равняйся ты со мною!

- Об этом лучше помолчи! –
Сказала ему Кошка –
Вот был бы ты умней немножко,
Раскинуть мог умом своим овечьим,
Увидел бы, что здесь гордиться нечем,

Ведь заслужил ты свой диплом
Не головой, а лбом.
----
Иной баран ни "ме", ни "бе",
А хочет звание себе.

Psychic Vampires: Author Baron Olshevri (tell more lies) from the family chronicle of the Counts Dracula - Kardi

In a certain village, in a certain country,
A ram walked with his flock.

Smart rams are rare,
But this one is even more foolish than the worst –

He doesn't recognize his own gate:
Obviously – his head is weak.
And his forehead, quite the opposite –
I've never seen such a forehead in my life:

When there's no one else smart around,
To fight foreheads,
He'll run up a storm – and then hit the wall – bang!!!
Another would already be in heaven,
And with him – all is well!

And for this stupidity,
The people jokingly dubbed him "scholar."
And to keep him from running past his own gate –
They hung a sign on him.

Here – they say – is your diploma. What kind of "diploma" is this? A ram don't understand neither "B " nor "M"
But he immediately began bragging to the Cat:
"What were you thinking, sister?
There's something to brag about, no matter how you grumble:
I earned the diploma, however, with my head!
And don't try to compare yourself to me!"

"Better keep quiet about that!" the Cat said to him.
If you a little smarter was,you wouldn't show off your stupid mind."You have nothing to be proud of here.

After all, you earned your diploma
Not with your head, but with your forehead."
----
"Some rams don't understamd either "B " or "M"", - Boris Ivanov said .
But they want a title for themselves,ad grandmaster in draughts composition .
They want that people believe them that their diploma is real, and not created on their home printer.

[Shkludov]

----
"Some rams don't understamd either "B " or "M"", - Boris Ivanov said .
But they want a title for themselves,ad grandmaster in draughts composition .
They want that people believe them that their diploma is real, and not created on their home printer.

Знаете, друзья, я передумал.
Фомин каждый раз повторяет, и повторяет, и повторяет - одно и то же, одно и то же, одно и то же...
Я не стану отвечать Фомину, и не стану разбирать по косточкам его клеветнические опусы.
Пусть сам, в одиночку тонет в этой маразматике!
У меня есть дела поважнее.

[FOMIN]

Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA. We draw attention to this place where the provocateur is openly lying.<>
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

[Shkludov]

Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA.
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

Знаете, друзья, я передумал.
Фомин каждый раз повторяет, и повторяет, и повторяет - одно и то же, одно и то же, одно и то же...
Я не стану отвечать Фомину, и не стану разбирать по косточкам его клеветнические опусы.
Пусть сам, в одиночку тонет в этой маразматике!
У меня есть дела поважнее.

[FOMIN]

Screenshot_20251023-140600.jpg
Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA. We draw attention to this place where the provocateur is openly lying.<>
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. The bold font and large, arshin-sized letters indicate the course of the psychic warlord to absorb the energy of the forum's readers.Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

[Shkludov]

Screenshot_20251023-140600.jpg
Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA. We draw attention to this place where the provocateur is openly lying.<>
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

Знаете, друзья, я передумал.
Фомин каждый раз повторяет, и повторяет, и повторяет - одно и то же, одно и то же, одно и то же...
Я не стану отвечать Фомину, и не стану разбирать по косточкам его клеветнические опусы.
Пусть сам, в одиночку тонет в этой маразматике!
У меня есть дела поважнее.

Сколько раз надо повторить, чтобы непонятливый Фомин всё понял - мне ПРОТИВНО разговаривать с ним.

[FOMIN]

Screenshot_20251023-140600.jpg
Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA. We draw attention to this place where the provocateur is openly lying.<>
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. The bold font and large, arshin-sized letters indicate the course of the psychic warlord to absorb the energy of the forum's readers.Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

An energy vampire is lying every time he opens his mouth: no one argues with him or engages in any conversation. The author of this lines some times saw energy vampire , but throughout the entire much times , he was somewhere on the horizon. The energy vampire and the author of these lines didn't exchange a single phrase during 4,5 decades , For this reason, he has no reason to try to start any kind of dispute with the author of this post.

[Shkludov]

Screenshot_20251023-140600.jpg
Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA. We draw attention to this place where the provocateur is openly lying.<>
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. The bold font and large, arshin-sized letters indicate the course of the psychic warlord to absorb the energy of the forum's readers.Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

An energy vampire is lying every time he opens his mouth: no one argues with him or engages in any conversation. The author of this lines some times saw energy vampire , but throughout the entire much times , he was somewhere on the horizon. The energy vampire and the author of these lines didn't exchange a single phrase during 4,5 decades , For this reason, he has no reason to try to start any kind of dispute with the author of this post.

Знаете, друзья, я передумал.
Фомин каждый раз повторяет, и повторяет, и повторяет - одно и то же, одно и то же, одно и то же...
Я не стану отвечать Фомину, и не стану разбирать по косточкам его клеветнические опусы.
Пусть сам, в одиночку тонет в этой маразматике!
У меня есть дела поважнее.

Сколько раз надо повторить, чтобы непонятливый Фомин всё понял - мне ПРОТИВНО разговаривать с ним.

Увы - пять раз не достаточно...
Смотрите господа, что такое провокация по-Фомину.

[FOMIN]

Screenshot_20251023-140600.jpg
Another attack by a psychic vampire, hoping to start an argument. The question arises: why the hell is a psychic vampire meddling in something that's none of his business? The authors themselves will figure out who's worth what without the psychic vampire's interference.In doing so, the forger distorts what is actually written above the diagram, deliberately not citing the original text of the author's publication.
The provocateur writes: So what do we have in the end?
IDEA - Kamchitsky...
PROCESSING - Fomin!
And who is the author of the composition?
But it turns out there's no author!!!
A logical conclusion.
After all, the PROCESSOR (Fomin), according to the rules, has no right to authorship, and at the same time, the processor denies authorship of the position to Kamchitsky, clarifying that he is the author only of the IDEA. We draw attention to this place where the provocateur is openly lying.<>
It turns out that it's not enough to compose; you also need to be able to correctly attribute authorship. And when your head is "fighting cockroaches," it's difficult to place authorial emphasis.

Last edited by: Admin (Tue Oct 21, 2025 9:30 am), edited 3 times in total

AdminAdmin

Posts: 26,960
Registration Date: 2011-04-25
Age: 65
From: Belarus, Novopolotsk

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. The bold font and large, arshin-sized letters indicate the course of the psychic warlord to absorb the energy of the forum's readers.Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

An energy vampire is lying every time he opens his mouth: no one argues with him or engages in any conversation. The author of this lines some times saw energy vampire , but throughout the entire much times , he was somewhere on the horizon. The energy vampire and the author of these lines didn't exchange a single phrase during 4,5 decades , For this reason, he has no reason to try to start any kind of dispute with the author of this post.

A provocateur interfered in the relationship between two draughts composers, even though they didn't ask him to, and then wonders why he was called a psychic vampire.

[Shkludov]

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. The bold font and large, arshin-sized letters indicate the course of the psychic warlord to absorb the energy of the forum's readers.Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

An energy vampire is lying every time he opens his mouth: no one argues with him or engages in any conversation. The author of this lines some times saw energy vampire , but throughout the entire much times , he was somewhere on the horizon. The energy vampire and the author of these lines didn't exchange a single phrase during 4,5 decades , For this reason, he has no reason to try to start any kind of dispute with the author of this post.

A provocateur interfered in the relationship between two draughts composers, even though they didn't ask him to, and then wonders why he was called a psychic vampire.

Знаете, друзья, я передумал.
Фомин каждый раз повторяет, и повторяет, и повторяет - одно и то же, одно и то же, одно и то же...
Я не стану отвечать Фомину, и не стану разбирать по косточкам его клеветнические опусы.
Пусть сам, в одиночку тонет в этой маразматике!
У меня есть дела поважнее.

Сколько раз надо повторить, чтобы непонятливый Фомин всё понял - мне ПРОТИВНО разговаривать с ним.

Увы - ШЕСТЬ раз не достаточно...
Смотрите господа, что такое провокация по-Фомину.

[FOMIN]

The psychic vampire has gotten worked up and is simply filling the airwaves with monotonous phrases, posing as a justice of the peace. The bold font and large, arshin-sized letters indicate the course of the psychic warlord to absorb the energy of the forum's readers.Regarding this, Milenko Lepsitch wrote : I wouldn't recommend Ukrainians destroying Lenin monuments; this monument needs a little changing - tweaking .Lenin head.

An energy vampire is lying every time he opens his mouth: no one argues with him or engages in any conversation. The author of this lines some times saw energy vampire , but throughout the entire much times , he was somewhere on the horizon. The energy vampire and the author of these lines didn't exchange a single phrase during 4,5 decades , For this reason, he has no reason to try to start any kind of dispute with the author of this post.

A provocateur interfered in the relationship between two draughts composers, even though they didn't ask him to, and then wonders why he was called a psychic vampire.

The psychic vampire from Ward No. 6, manipulating with large letters , continues to press on the psyche of the esteemed reader. He still hasn't even bothered to explain to readers how Nikolai Grushevskyi's email address suddenly received the title of International Arbiter of Checkers Composition, even though it was P. Shkludov who composed this address and handed it over to Vladimir Iatus for work. Now, P. Shkludov, having drunk his fill of blood, is clogging the airwaves with a tally of his yard-sized posts.

[Shkludov]

An energy vampire is lying every time he opens his mouth: no one argues with him or engages in any conversation. The author of this lines some times saw energy vampire , but throughout the entire much times , he was somewhere on the horizon. The energy vampire and the author of these lines didn't exchange a single phrase during 4,5 decades , For this reason, he has no reason to try to start any kind of dispute with the author of this post.

A provocateur interfered in the relationship between two draughts composers, even though they didn't ask him to, and then wonders why he was called a psychic vampire.

The psychic vampire from Ward No. 6, manipulating yard-sized letters, continues to press on the psyche of the esteemed reader. He still hasn't even bothered to explain to readers how Nikolai Grushevskyi's email address suddenly received the title of International Arbiter of Checkers Composition, even though it was P. Shkludov who composed this address and handed it over to Vladimir Iatus for work. Now, P. Shkludov, having drunk his fill of blood, is clogging the airwaves with a tally of his yard-sized posts.

Знаете, друзья, я передумал.
Фомин каждый раз повторяет, и повторяет, и повторяет - одно и то же, одно и то же, одно и то же...
Я не стану отвечать Фомину, и не стану разбирать по косточкам его клеветнические опусы.
Пусть сам, в одиночку тонет в этой маразматике!
У меня есть дела поважнее.

Сколько раз надо повторить, чтобы непонятливый Фомин всё понял - мне ПРОТИВНО разговаривать с ним.

Увы - СЕМЬ раз не достаточно...
Смотрите господа, что такое провокация по-Фомину.